Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges
Groppi, Tania (ed.)
Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges - Oxford, United Kingdom ; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2013. - xxxviii, 431 p. : ill. ; 25 cm. - Hart studies in comparative public law ; v. 1 . - Hart studies in comparative public law ; v. 1. .
Includes bibliographical references.
the methodology of the research : how to assess the reality of transjudicial communication? / Reference to foreign precedents by the Australian High Court: a matter of method / Canada: protecting rights in a "worldwide rights culture", an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) / India: a "critical" use of foreign precedents in constitutional adjudication / The Supreme Court of Ireland and the use of foreign precedents: the value of constitutional history / Israel: creating a constitution: the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) / Namibia: the Supreme Court as a foreign law importer / South Africa: teaching an "old dog" new tricks? an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) / Austria: non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly: the Constitutional Court's comparative approach / Lifting the constitutional curtain? the use of foreign precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court / Hungary: unsystematic and incoherent borrowing of law: the use of foreign judicial precedents in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 / A gap between the apparent and hidden attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards foreign precedents / Mexico: struggling for an open view in constitutional adjudication / Romania: analogical reasoning as a dialectical instrument / Russia: foreign transplants in the Russian Constitution and invisible foreign precedents in decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court / Judges as discursive agent: the use of foreign precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan / United States of America: first cautious attempts of judicial use of foreign precedents in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence / The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges: a limited practice, an uncertain future / Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau -- Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone.-- Gianluca Gentili -- Valentina Rita Scotti -- Cristina Fasone -- Suzie Navot -- Irene Spigno -- Christa Rautenbach -- Anna Gamper -- Stefan Martini -- Zoltán Szente -- Akiko Ejima -- Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil -- Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu -- Sergey Belov -- Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh -- Angioletta Sperti -- Tania Groppi and Marie-Clair Ponthoreau. Introduction : Pt. 1: Pt. 2: Conclusion:
9781849462716 (cloth : alk. paper) 1849462712 (cloth : alk. paper)
2013371522
GBB2B7763 bnb
016215740 Uk
Judgments, Foreign.
Stare decisis.
Constitutional courts.
K7680 / .U82 2013
342.03 GRO
Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges - Oxford, United Kingdom ; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2013. - xxxviii, 431 p. : ill. ; 25 cm. - Hart studies in comparative public law ; v. 1 . - Hart studies in comparative public law ; v. 1. .
Includes bibliographical references.
the methodology of the research : how to assess the reality of transjudicial communication? / Reference to foreign precedents by the Australian High Court: a matter of method / Canada: protecting rights in a "worldwide rights culture", an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) / India: a "critical" use of foreign precedents in constitutional adjudication / The Supreme Court of Ireland and the use of foreign precedents: the value of constitutional history / Israel: creating a constitution: the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) / Namibia: the Supreme Court as a foreign law importer / South Africa: teaching an "old dog" new tricks? an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) / Austria: non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly: the Constitutional Court's comparative approach / Lifting the constitutional curtain? the use of foreign precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court / Hungary: unsystematic and incoherent borrowing of law: the use of foreign judicial precedents in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 / A gap between the apparent and hidden attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards foreign precedents / Mexico: struggling for an open view in constitutional adjudication / Romania: analogical reasoning as a dialectical instrument / Russia: foreign transplants in the Russian Constitution and invisible foreign precedents in decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court / Judges as discursive agent: the use of foreign precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan / United States of America: first cautious attempts of judicial use of foreign precedents in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence / The use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges: a limited practice, an uncertain future / Tania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau -- Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone.-- Gianluca Gentili -- Valentina Rita Scotti -- Cristina Fasone -- Suzie Navot -- Irene Spigno -- Christa Rautenbach -- Anna Gamper -- Stefan Martini -- Zoltán Szente -- Akiko Ejima -- Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil -- Elena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu -- Sergey Belov -- Wen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh -- Angioletta Sperti -- Tania Groppi and Marie-Clair Ponthoreau. Introduction : Pt. 1: Pt. 2: Conclusion:
9781849462716 (cloth : alk. paper) 1849462712 (cloth : alk. paper)
2013371522
GBB2B7763 bnb
016215740 Uk
Judgments, Foreign.
Stare decisis.
Constitutional courts.
K7680 / .U82 2013
342.03 GRO
