India and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Refusal, Acceptance, Backlash
Publication details: New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2019Edition: 1Description: 378ISBN:- 9780199493746
- 346.54092 RAN
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Alliance School of Law | 346.54092 RAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 5 | Available | L10807 | |||
![]() |
Alliance School of Law | 346.54092 RAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 4 | Available | L10806 | |||
![]() |
Alliance School of Law | 346.54092 RAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 2 | Available | L10804 | |||
![]() |
Alliance School of Law | 346.54092 RAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 3 | Available | L10805 | |||
![]() |
Alliance School of Law | 346.54092 RAN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | L10803 |
Browsing Alliance School of Law shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
As a consequence of being sued by more than 20 foreign investors, India terminated close to 60 investment treaties and adopted a new model bilateral investment treaty (BIT) purportedly to balance investment protection with the host State's right to regulate. This book studies critically India's approach towards BITs by tracing its origin, evolution, and the current state of play. The book does so by locating it in India's economic policy in general and policy towards foreign investment in particular. India's approach towards BITs and its policy towards foreign investment were consistent with each other in the periods of economic nationalism (1947-1990) and economic liberalism (1991-2010). However, post 2010, India's approach to BITs has become protectionist while India's foreign investment policy continues to be liberal. In order to balance investment protection with the State's right to regulate, India needs to evolve its BIT practice based on the twin framework of international rule of law and embedded liberalism.
There are no comments on this title.