000 | 03754cam a2200385 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c23177 _d23177 |
||
001 | 17787431 | ||
005 | 20200623103242.0 | ||
008 | 130621s2013 enka b 000 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a 2013371522 | ||
015 |
_aGBB2B7763 _2bnb |
||
016 | 7 |
_a016215740 _2Uk |
|
020 | _a9781849462716 (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
020 | _a1849462712 (cloth : alk. paper) | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)ocn819521268 | ||
040 |
_aUKMGB _beng _cUKMGB _dOCLCO _dYDXCP _dCDX _dILI _dBWK _dOWT _dUAB _dBWX _dGZL _dDLC |
||
042 | _alccopycat | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aK7680 _b.U82 2013 |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a342.03 GRO _223 |
100 | _aGroppi, Tania (ed.) | ||
245 | 0 | 4 | _aUse of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges |
260 |
_aOxford, United Kingdom ; _aPortland, Or. : _bHart Pub., _c2013. |
||
300 |
_axxxviii, 431 p. : _bill. ; _c25 cm. |
||
490 | 1 |
_aHart studies in comparative public law ; _vv. 1 |
|
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_gIntroduction : _tthe methodology of the research : how to assess the reality of transjudicial communication? / _rTania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau -- _gPt. 1: _tReference to foreign precedents by the Australian High Court: a matter of method / _rCheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone.-- _tCanada: protecting rights in a "worldwide rights culture", an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) / _rGianluca Gentili -- _tIndia: a "critical" use of foreign precedents in constitutional adjudication / _rValentina Rita Scotti -- _tThe Supreme Court of Ireland and the use of foreign precedents: the value of constitutional history / _rCristina Fasone -- _tIsrael: creating a constitution: the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) / _rSuzie Navot -- _tNamibia: the Supreme Court as a foreign law importer / _rIrene Spigno -- _tSouth Africa: teaching an "old dog" new tricks? an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) / _rChrista Rautenbach -- _gPt. 2: _tAustria: non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly: the Constitutional Court's comparative approach / _rAnna Gamper -- _tLifting the constitutional curtain? the use of foreign precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court / _rStefan Martini -- _tHungary: unsystematic and incoherent borrowing of law: the use of foreign judicial precedents in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 / _rZoltán Szente -- _tA gap between the apparent and hidden attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards foreign precedents / _rAkiko Ejima -- _tMexico: struggling for an open view in constitutional adjudication / _rEduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil -- _tRomania: analogical reasoning as a dialectical instrument / _rElena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu -- _tRussia: foreign transplants in the Russian Constitution and invisible foreign precedents in decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court / _rSergey Belov -- _tJudges as discursive agent: the use of foreign precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan / _rWen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh -- _tUnited States of America: first cautious attempts of judicial use of foreign precedents in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence / _rAngioletta Sperti -- _gConclusion: _tThe use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges: a limited practice, an uncertain future / _rTania Groppi and Marie-Clair Ponthoreau. |
650 | 0 | _aJudgments, Foreign. | |
650 | 0 | _aStare decisis. | |
650 | 0 | _aConstitutional courts. | |
700 | 1 | _aGroppi, Tania. | |
700 | 1 | _aPonthoreau, Marie-Claire. | |
830 | 0 |
_aHart studies in comparative public law ; _vv. 1. |
|
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _encip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 | _cRB | ||
955 |
_bxg16 2013-06-21 z-processor _ixg16 2013-06-21 to LL |